The review process for submitted papers typically involves the following steps:
- Initial screening: The paper is screened to ensure that it meets the conference’s submission guidelines and requirements, such as formatting, and scope. Papers that do not meet these requirements are often immediately rejected without further review.
- Assignment to reviewers: The paper is assigned to several reviewers who have expertise in the field and are available to review the paper. Reviewers are typically selected based on their research experience and reputation in the field.
- Review and feedback: The reviewers read the paper carefully and provide detailed feedback, including comments on the strengths and weaknesses of the paper, suggestions for improvement, and a recommendation for acceptance or rejection.
- Author revisions: Based on the feedback from the reviewers, the authors may revise their paper and resubmit it for further review. The revised paper is usually evaluated by the same reviewers who provided feedback on the original submission.
- Final decision: The conference organizers make the final decision on whether to accept or reject the paper based on the feedback from the reviewers and the overall quality and relevance of the paper After the Double-Blind pre Review Check.
- Notification to authors: The authors are notified of the decision on their paper, including any feedback from the reviewers. If the paper is accepted, the authors are often provided with instructions on how to prepare their presentations for the conference.
The review process is an essential aspect of conference paper submission, as it ensures that only high-quality and relevant papers are accepted for presentation. The process is designed to be thorough and fair, with the goal of providing constructive feedback to authors and selecting the best papers for the conference program.
